Hello.

My name is Brad Rosser and I have founded the Justice For All Group.

My ambition for Justice for All is to attack industries where there can be injustice and where we have the expertise to help those who find themselves in a simply awful position.

As part of this fight, I started a business to help those being unfairly litigated against. This is one of many businesses that I will create to fight injustices. Others will follow.

At Justice For All, we fight side by side with people who are dealing with an injustice. We will battle with you every step of the way through some of the most difficult moments of your life. 

Why Justice For All Litigation Relief? Let me explain.

Have you ever been blindsided by an attack when you know you have done nothing wrong? What if those attacking have engineered the situation so they have nothing to lose?

If this is something you’ve experienced, you’ll know it takes the wind out of your sails. It’s frightening and confusing. It robs you of your confidence and debilitates you at a time when the first steps are critical.

Things only get worse once you get the distinct feeling you are working in the confines of a gentleman’s club where you are not a member and some of those members do not have your best interests at heart. How do you find honest members who can actually help you?

It doesn’t help that most explanations of any legal process are full of technical jargon when what’s needed is a straightforward explanation in plain English. Without a clear understanding of the process there is no transparency, it is hard to stay in control and costs can escalate at a frightening pace.

Lawyers do not necessarily have the understanding or skills to undertake every area of work required quickly, efficiently and most importantly, correctly. In a worst-case scenario, this can potentially jeopardise a fair outcome.

To complicate matters, many lawyers don’t have personal experience of the business world you live and breathe, particularly if it is a very entrepreneurial environment. This can make it difficult for them to clearly understand your actions and the reasons why what you did was fair, reasonable and commercially correct at the time.

When these circumstances conspire, things can go wrong through no fault of yours. Often, the process of resolving your position successfully is too uncertain, too long, too heart-breaking, too expensive and too stressful for you and your family. Justice For All was set up to help those who find themselves in this position.

I know all too well the perils of litigation and the underhanded tactics used to create anxiety, self doubt and fear.

My entrepreneurial background means I like disrupting gentleman clubs, and what’s even better is that in this case, it also means correcting an injustice.

We will fight together to ensure a fair outcome, and you can be sure we will go at it hard, fast and fairly.

The litigation industry is bewildering and can be unfair, but it does not need to be.

My story

It was my own experience, not once but three times, that ignited my passion for the litigation industry. Here’s what happened to me, along with some of the very specific issues that I feel need addressing to ensure a fair outcome for anyone caught in litigation.

One day, out of the blue, five archer leaf bundles appeared accusing me of all sorts of wrongdoing from a person I had never met. The person making the allegations had nothing to lose financially but did have a lot to gain by winning. No risk for the accuser but everything was at stake for me. 

A loss would potentially be financially disastrous and leave my reputation in ruins. New to the litigation world, a touch naïve but with my radar up, I got a recommendation for a high profile “reputable set of lawyers” and hired them. I shared my views on strategy and argument, which were duly ignored.

The disaster continued. 

What irked me and still does was the way some lawyers cloak the entire process in mystery by using legalise and making each step sound insurmountable and extremely difficult.

I continued but started to get disillusioned as we muddled through what seemed to me to be a rudderless process with no clear strategy. I felt like I was continually on the back foot, always reacting and never leading.

However, challenging the status quo and striving for better solutions is in my DNA, never more so than when I sense a broken system.

I did my best to understand the process, including which parts of the work would be better done by someone with a different skill set to lawyers, and began to consider redefining the roles of the advisors.

Finally, after spending far too much money, enough was enough. It was time for a change, so I sacked those lawyers.

I changed solicitors to someone who was more practical, more caring, cost effective and very straightforward to deal with. I continued with the same junior barrister who could be completely relied upon. I continued to redefine the process to be more effective, less costly and quicker. I defined my role to take on work the lawyers were not suited for and became more involved.

We developed a course of action and defence and won the case within months. It was struck out before even getting into court. 

To say it was a heartbreaking and stressful learning experience would be an absolute understatement. The frustration, agony and expense…but that wasn’t all. Because the other person was taking a one-way bet, when they lost they went bankrupt and even though I was entitled to my costs, they were never recovered. 

Having dealt with that I again came under attack when I was sued twice more. Both times from what I consider unscrupulous administrators with nothing to lose.

First, as part of their strategy they recommended a director disqualification. I fought with my excellent but junior barrister at a minimum cost and had the case abandoned by the Secretary of State. Using my learnings, we agreed an argument and I took on the bulk of the workload and analysis of the evidence. I won and this time I got the bulk of my costs back.

Undeterred, the administrators came at me and a number of others again. 

They didn’t care if they lost because it cost them nothing. Even though this case involved essentially the same accusations as the failed director disqualification, they came at us aggressively and tried to bully their way to victory. With insurance in place they had nothing to lose so they felt invincible. The costs were all on my side in the form of time and stress, but that didn’t matter to them. 

If I lost, I was ruined. 

I had great faith in the judiciary, believing if we got it right justice would be served. After a 6-week trial and being cross examined for 8 days, we won. Not only did we win, we won convincingly. 100% indemnity costs, also known as a landslide victory. My faith, which was the main thing keeping me sane, was rewarded as it had been each time previously.

The ride this time was still not pleasant, but it was bearable. I was in control, I understood the process and the defence and I did careful financial analysis. I was hands on reviewing 100,000 emails, org charts, and finances amongst other things, and I also had a great team. 

Having learned through bitter experience, I spent less than a third of the other defendants. My training in accounting and finance, time at McKinsey and Co, my entrepreneurial experiences and feeling of outrage fuelled me. At times I even enjoyed it. I had done no wrong and I was going to win. And I did.

It was quite a different experience from the first litigation.

Let me be clear. We don’t replace barristers and lawyers, but we guide and counsel, pick the members of the club who will be true and strong and fair, save time, money and stress and engineer the best possible defence. You need to keep a tight rein on the instructions the solicitors and barristers are provided and steer them clear of work they are not equipped to do. 

Because of our backgrounds we can cut through and do the heavy lifting for your defence including financial and email analysis. We try to get the litigation stopped before it begins but, if a trial is needed, we prepare you, particularly for cross examination. If funding is an issue, we can introduce you to funders.

Sometimes an antiquated process needs an injection of creativity from outside the industry. 

We are fair, strong-minded, can do and commercial people. If we can help, we will. If we can’t we won’t try. Stopping injustice fuels us and if we can’t help, we will try and point you in the right direction.

If what you’ve read appeals to you and you’re looking for guidance, please contact us. It is so emotionally debilitating, and we could just save you years of stress and wasted expense. 

 Working together we will thwart an injustice.